Right now the popular answer might be "zero sounds good" but let us put that aside for the moment. The current Rogue-Hugo-Committee issue means an old discussion about some kind of permanent WSFS supervising committee has restarted. The idea being that there is a kind of Supreme Court or Board of Directors etc which can ensure rules are followed and complaints dealt with. The resistance to that idea is varied. The existing organisational structure is a unique experiment in democracy. Yes, it occasionally catches fire but then so do things like the SFWA and the Nebulas who have a more traditional structure and a President who you can shout at. Another concern is that such a committee would end up controlled by exactly the people who are causing the current problem.
There are other current challenges. One is the internationalization of Worldcon. Another is the current convention can't really grow. Another is a physical convention faces issues from local bigotry, to visa restrictions, to pandemics, or even military conflicts and broader geopolitics. We have had some experiments with online conventions to address these issues and to provide a more modern experience. However, Worldcon remains structurally a physical convention and any online addition depends on the group running a physical convention.
So maybe split them. Each year have two Worldcons. Trad-Worldcon being a convention in a physical place, just like the existing con, run in much the same way. Neo-Worldcon, on the other hand, being an expressly online event run by a nominally different set of people (it could be the same group bidding for both but they'd be seperate bids).
The Hugo Award Ceremony would stay with Trad-Worldcon but everything else about the Hugo Awards is essential online, so would sit with the Neo-Worldcon. The Neo-Worldcon would still have to have a nominal location for legal reasons (i.e. so that people know what laws apply to the handling of data etc) but issues like visa regulations or pandemic lockdowns etc would be much easier to deal with.
Ideally both Worldcons would work together. They might not, they might fight in some big fannish fight over something but you'd have a kind of seperation of powers and a degree of accountability between the two. It would also be a lot harder for somebody just to take over the whole thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment